HK and the olympics
The Question
So, the logical question you should be asking is "Why is Hong Kong in the Olympics? Aren't they part of China?" Ah, this is where the olympics gets political. You need to ask "What is a country?" Perhaps a SAR is not a country, but a level of sovereignty. Perhaps the Olympics is only open to sovereign nations. Is Hong Kong sovereign?
So, let's reanalyse our question. Hong Kong is part of China. Before it was part of China, it was a colony of Britain. Was it part of Britain before? Can colonies compete in the Olympics? How about pseudo-colonies? If not, there goes Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and a slew of other British special administrative regions (heh).
Are the olympics open only to countries? Where is the line between country and non-country? Is a colony a country or not?
"Doug, answer the question."
Well, I don't know why Hong Kong is a separate delegate from China in the Olympics. Maybe we won't ever know how this happened. What seems clear in these International procedures is a change of status quo is permissible if the parties involved have no complains. What I presume is the case is that Hong Kong proposed to the IOC (Int'l Olympic Committee) to allow it to be a separate member of the Olympics, and China did not object. Whether there were any backroom deals involved in the negotiations between HK and China is anyone's guess.
HK results : 1 silver
So Hong Kong got one medal, in, who guessed; Ping Pong (Men's Doubles). I wonder if that has the Chinese officials re-evaluating the HK membership in the Olympics, when that medal could have been China's, earning them another medal among their 3 in the 6 medals possible in that sport (Tied for 3rd place is HK, Denmark and North Korea with South Korea in 2nd place).
And the HK medal-winners are heralded as modern-day heroes.
They are on magazine covers and newspapers. I guess when you're a small member of the Olympics, you appreciate the medals you get. When you're a bigger country, you have the novelty of then counting the medals.
China shocked the world with its enormous 2nd-place Gold medal count of 32 Gold, (3rd in overall medal count, 2nd was Russia).
2008 - Beijing
So, our next summer Olympics will be in Beijing. This is an interesting development since China did so well this year, lest we ignore the Olympic's lesser-known sibling the Winter Olympics, typically dominated by those few industrialized cold-loving nations. I can understand how the Winter Olympics are less popular - how are tropical nations to relate and admire sports they never see? The conditions for many of the Summer Olympics are low, if the sport does not involve the cold or snow, it's a summer olympic sport. Ping Pong,is an indoor sport. For risk of players losing consciousness, Fencing can't be done in the Summer heat. Winter Olympics has slim pickings of the popular sports. You need ice or snow and the cold. This can be a difficult investment for tropical nations.
Politics of national self-determination
Remember some 4 years ago when the 2008 Summer games were deciding a venue? The politics of the Olympics were more apparent, especially here in Canada where Toronto was vying for a bid amidst Mel Lastman's yammering mentionables. Perhaps it was our national sense of pride that churned out the rhetoric and fogging our views, or actual legitimate concerns, but the backlash against Beijing was huge. Citing human-rights abuses and the political regime of the communist state, Beijing was seen under a political microscope that exists with the Olympics. And then we had Toronto mayor Mel Lastman proclaim something inherently racist. I hate to repeat hearsay as legitimate rhetoric, but he said something about his experience in Africa as feeling like he was in a cauldron about to be eaten. I should really look this quote up to be fair to the poor guy. Knowing that his city had a surefire Olympic bid, I'm sure he meant well. I recall seeing on the news some people who still had an iota of effort left after Toronto's bid was rejected, they were holding signs that read "Thanks Mel". Ouch. I happen to know that Mel Lastman is supportive of Toronto. I don't think any other mayor woul dhave the audacity to support the Hell's Angels enough to sport their jacket when they went to Toronto to hold their national convention. Boy did he get heat for that.
Olympics and politics
So...the Olympics can be pretty political. The world reacted to Korea participating united, North and South. Hitler wanted to prove Aryan superiority at the 1932 Olympics in Berlin Germany (he failed). Who gets to participate is political, largely in the realm of powerful nations. I still think the Olympics is about sport, and political people can see politics in anything, absolutely anything if they try hard enough. So Hong Kong is in the Olympics. The questions we ask can be political, as this whole tirade would indicate. And the questions can be sports-related, like "So, who were the gents who won Silver?"
Great! Can I be sovereign too?
Political conclusion: Sovereignty is the realm of powerful nations. My brother asked me if he could be sovereign - I said sure, just read my "How-To Guide on having your Own Sovereign Nation", out on this blog soon.
