Philosophical Closure
I am cresting the hill of a philosophical closure in my life.
I am left with little to ponder; I am grabbing at gaping thoughts making mountains out of molehills to find there's nothing to the basis of it and the philosophical exercise neither benefits me nor my time. At the age of a quarter of a century, I possess the mindful arrogance of a 50 year old, dispensing advice and direction with the sweeping confidence of a 15-year-old. Although I feel I have earned the experience of my advice and the practical knowledge to apply it myself, I have neither the credibility to dispense it nor the trust from others. It is a dilemma I inflate to occupy my mind at this point, at my philosophical closure.
I have sealed my thoughts on the subject of omnipotence. What would someone omnipotent do when faced with everyday situations? Having infinite knowledge, would they proceed with upmost tact, or would they result with the same shortcomings as everyone else? They would have a benefit of experience and knowledge, and those around us who seem most knowledgeable and experienced, and draw on it, seem omnipotent and valuable for giving advice. But, omnipotence cannot predict the future, nor can it reduce uncertainty. The randomness of multiple factors coinciding with individual will reduces the effect of the insight of omnipotence, even compromising the best of knowledge and experience.
I now think about something more tangible; what can an average common person do to be come extraordinary? How do some people distinguish themselves among common people? My interest is not in the elites or their power structure, but the everyday interests or everyday people. Maybe class divisions are definitive, necessary. Class mobility is possible, but is it necessary to move to the elite class from the common or popular class when becoming political?
More on this, maybe, later, maybe.

More photos from this group
I am left with little to ponder; I am grabbing at gaping thoughts making mountains out of molehills to find there's nothing to the basis of it and the philosophical exercise neither benefits me nor my time. At the age of a quarter of a century, I possess the mindful arrogance of a 50 year old, dispensing advice and direction with the sweeping confidence of a 15-year-old. Although I feel I have earned the experience of my advice and the practical knowledge to apply it myself, I have neither the credibility to dispense it nor the trust from others. It is a dilemma I inflate to occupy my mind at this point, at my philosophical closure.
I have sealed my thoughts on the subject of omnipotence. What would someone omnipotent do when faced with everyday situations? Having infinite knowledge, would they proceed with upmost tact, or would they result with the same shortcomings as everyone else? They would have a benefit of experience and knowledge, and those around us who seem most knowledgeable and experienced, and draw on it, seem omnipotent and valuable for giving advice. But, omnipotence cannot predict the future, nor can it reduce uncertainty. The randomness of multiple factors coinciding with individual will reduces the effect of the insight of omnipotence, even compromising the best of knowledge and experience.
I now think about something more tangible; what can an average common person do to be come extraordinary? How do some people distinguish themselves among common people? My interest is not in the elites or their power structure, but the everyday interests or everyday people. Maybe class divisions are definitive, necessary. Class mobility is possible, but is it necessary to move to the elite class from the common or popular class when becoming political?
More on this, maybe, later, maybe.

More photos from this group

